BREAKING: Putin Visits The Russian Duma And Opens A Possibility Of Running For President in 2024!

Thank you very much. Mr Volodin, State Duma deputies, Mr Speaker informed me about the discussion that took place here during the second reading of amendments to the Constitution. Considering the fact that the discussion was of a fundamental nature and that it was my initiative, as you know, to have a broad discussion on the possible amendments to the main law of Russia, I found it necessary to speak out here, at the State Duma, without delay on the most important proposals voiced here today, and I informed the Speaker about this. Colleagues, but I would like to begin by thanking the members of the working group, State Duma deputies and Federation Council members, who participated directly and very intensely in developing amendments to the Constitution. Let me repeat, these amendments are long overdue; they are necessary and, I believe, will be useful for Russia, for society and for our people, because they are aimed at strengthening our sovereignty, our traditions, and our values – the foundation of our life; at expanding and specifying social guarantees, which means fully developing the social character of our country, and, in general, creating conditions for the confident, progressive and evolutionary development of Russia in the long historical term. I agree with the previous speakers: the world is indeed changing. And not just because of the rapid, explosive in fact, development of technology, but literally of all spheres of life. These changes are cardinal and, I would say, irreversible. We can see how difficult the situation in the global policy, security and the global economy is. We are also battling the coronavirus now, oil prices are fluctuating, together with the national currency exchange rate and stock exchanges. However, I would like to use this floor to say I have absolute confidence that we will get over this, and do so with dignity. The economy will grow stronger, and the most important industries will become more prominent and competitive. But we must work, and work together, consolidating our efforts. However, all this is creating additional risks for us or, as they say, challenges. At the same time, there are those who want to deter Russia and are ready to use any method for this, which we know and have pointed out more than once. In fact, the policy of deterrence has been used for a long time now, as we well know, and those who are pursuing it have said so openly and without being embarrassed. They are waiting for us to make a mistake or to slip up, losing our bearings or, worse still, getting bogged down in internal dissent, which is sometimes fanned, fuelled and even financed from abroad. It is even possible to calculate exactly how much money is allocated for this. This is something you can calculate. I know that Russia’s leading political forces have largely similar views on these matters. This was clearly indicated once again during my recent meeting with the leaders of the State Duma factions at the Kremlin, which began on March 5 and ended on March 6, as Mr Zyuganov pointed out after taking a look at his watch. At the same time, it is obvious to everyone that, unfortunately, many things in the country have only been tacked together hastily, as people say, and that we remain vulnerable in many respects. I am referring to political stability, ethnic and religious accord, as well as economic and social development. This is why our work on the amendments has provoked a question, which is being discussed increasingly more actively, about the further forming of the supreme institute of state power in Russia, or more precisely, presidential power. The President is the guarantor of the Constitution or, simply put, the guarantor of the country’s security, domestic stability and, as I said before, evolutionary development – I repeat, evolutionary development because we have had enough revolutions. Russia has fulfilled its plan when it comes to revolutions. By the way, I saw during my trips across the country that these questions worry our people no less than they do you, State Duma deputies. Their concern is understandable. I have no doubt that the day will come when the supreme, presidential power in Russia will not be so personified, if I may say so, that it will not be connected to a certain individual. But this is exactly how it was in our previous history, and we must take this into account. I am fully aware of my responsibility to the people, and I see that the people, or at least the majority of our society are waiting for my personal assessments and decisions on key matters of the development of the Russian state, both now and after 2024. Therefore, I will formulate my position in an abundantly clear, honest and straightforward manner, including my opinion on the specific proposals that have been made here and were generally raised during the discussion on amendments to the Constitution. As regards the position of Alexander Karelin on the need for new early elections to the State Duma, My point of view on this issue is known. If the citizens of Russia vote for the amendments to the Fundamental Law, including the transfer of some presidential powers to the State Duma and the Federation Council, such changes should enter into force immediately after the publication of the adopted amendments and, hence, the State Duma would receive its expanded powers there and then. This raises the question, do the current members of the State Duma have the right to accept these new powers? I think the answer is certainly positive. Why? There are all the legitimate legal grounds for this. Of course, in the final count, this is your decision. But if there is no consensus on this issue in parliament, and the Speaker told me there is none, I do not see the need for early elections to the State Duma. Let me say again that if people go to the polls on April 22 and vote, they will reaffirm the new authority of the State Duma. The people, the only source of power, will have their say. So that is settled. Let me repeat, this deals with substantial expansion of the parliament’s authority, and this is the road to closer work between the representative and executive branches of power. This, colleagues is how I planned it. This will enhance their reciprocal responsibility for the results of their work or failure I believe such changes are justified and sufficient at the current stage of our social development. In effect, this is a major step forward in developing our democracy. I would like to return to the issue that I mentioned at the beginning. We have indeed reached the line and before we cross this line we must, according to many participants of this discussion, make a decision on a fundamental and sensitive issue concerning the highest level of state authority, which is a presidential power. I think and I strongly believe that a strong presidential vertical for our country, for Russia is absolutely necessary. And today’s economic situation, as I have just pointed out, and the situation in other spheres such as security is another reminder. First of all, it is necessary for stability. Of course, there are other options, which we are well aware of, such as the parliamentary government, which is widely common in the world. However, at the current stage of our development, it is not suitable for us. Look at what is happening in the European countries with a traditional parliamentary democracy. Some of these countries cannot even form their governments for years, without any exaggeration. For Russia, this is absolutely impossible and completely unacceptable. Now, for example, granting other bodies of power such as the Security Council or the State Council – which are all the more so not directly elected by the people – with certain serious powers of a presidential nature would be, in my opinion, wrong and unacceptable, even dangerous. Firstly, it has nothing to do with democracy. Secondly, it will inevitably result in the division of society. I am certain that Mr Zhirinovsky, who came forward with this proposal as far as I am aware, having a lot of experience as a politician will agree with me. In Russia, it will inevitably result in the duality of power, a public divide, and will affect the fate of the country and the people in the most negative and perhaps tragic way. So let us not take this road. There have been proposals and ideas to amend the Constitution to extend the term of the current President, your humble servant, to do so on condition people vote (if they do) for this amendment. Yes, the national vote is to take place in April. But in this case, the authority of the President would be extended as a result of a clear-choice election. I think this is also wrong and should not be done. Russian citizens must have an alternative at any election, including the presidential election. All elections must be open and competitive. Generally speaking, the proposals made by Valentina Tereshkova, we have a deep respect for her, and I would like to congratulate you, Ms Tereshkova, on your recent birthday once again, are also understandable. The first is to remove from the Constitution the number of terms for which the country’s top official may be elected. A similar idea was voiced at my recent meeting with the public in St Petersburg. This is exactly what one veteran suggested. I said then that I did not wish to return to Soviet times. I will be straight, this remark was inappropriate because there were no elections in Soviet times. Everything was done behind the scenes, or as a result of some inter-party procedures or intrigues. There were no real elections then. Now the situation is very different. This is true. It is necessary to go and vote. This is a different situation. Strictly speaking, it would technically be possible to cancel the restriction on the number of terms, all the more so since it does not exist in many other countries, including our neighbors. They have no restrictions on the number of presidential terms. Incidentally, the amendment to the Constitution that limits the number to two presidential terms only appeared overseas, in the United States, in 1947. It was only in 1951 that it was voted for and ratified by all states. 1951 is not that far off, just yesterday in terms of history, I will explain why. Incidentally, there are precedents for elections for more than two terms, including in the United States. And why? Look: the Great Depression, huge economic problems, unemployment and poverty in the US at that time, and later on, World War II. When a country is going through such upheavals and such difficulties (in our case we have not yet overcome all the problems since the USSR, this is also clear), stability may be more important and must be given priority. All the more so, let me repeat, when a country still has many problems. But when the political, economic and social spheres gain internal stability and maturity, when the country becomes, undoubtedly more powerful and less vulnerable from the outside, then the possible alteration of power, of course, becomes more important. This is necessary for the development of the country. We do not adopt amendments for a year, or two years or even ten years, I hope; but for a longer historical term, at least 30–50 years. For this long term, society must have guarantees for the regular change of power. We should think about the generations to come. This is why I do not believe it is viable to delete the restriction on the number of presidential terms from the Constitution. In fact, the second proposal means lifting restrictions against any person, any citizen, including the current president, from taking part in an election in the future. In the course of transparent and competitive elections, naturally. And, naturally, only if Russian citizens support this proposal, this amendment, and say “yes” during the general vote on April 22. In fact, this amendment will only be possible under one condition: if the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation provides an official ruling that this amendment does not contradict the principles and the main provisions of the Constitution. Let us not forget, we are not adopting a new Constitution but only important amendments, which are still separate amendments. Let me stress once again that I do not believe it viable to change the Constitution in general, because it still has a lot of potential – on the contrary, it has proven its effectiveness – even to solve the issue of presidential power. This is why I am repeating this: if the Federal Assembly adopts the law on amendments to the Constitution as it is now, it must be sent to the Russian Federation Constitutional Court for an assessment and an official ruling. And, to conclude my speech, I would like to once again thank the State Duma deputies and the Federation Council members for their active and substantive work on the amendments to the Constitution. I would like to sincerely thank the Russian people for their support. I have felt it over the years. It would have been difficult and even impossible to do anything without this support, especially during the most difficult time at the beginning of the 2000s. I know that we have not managed to do everything we planned. I understand the criticism I hear, including that related to a number of difficult decisions. But I would like to assure you that I have and always will go by the current and long-term interests of Russia in my work. And exceptionally by the will of our people. By the way, this is why I have proposed holding a general vote for our people to decide on these amendments to the Constitution. And, to our people, I would like to say: it will be as you vote on April 22, my friends. You and I, against all odds, have done a lot to make our country stronger. I am sure that together we will do many more good things, at least before 2024. Then we will see.
Thank you.

100 thoughts on “BREAKING: Putin Visits The Russian Duma And Opens A Possibility Of Running For President in 2024!

  1. And the options are? So what if you choose someone else. What will change? Like in the west nothing changes except the name of the leader if that’s important for you then go ahead.

  2. No other leader would have pulled Russia from the brink of disaster after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The world needs him to maintain balance against the war mongers and disrupt the new world order.

  3. With the Disaster that's coming to the US as it implodes politically, I sure hope Mr Putin will still be around. These are very dangerous times and the world needs a champion to keep us safe and I don't see anyone better fit for that role.

  4. Sovereign Cultural Nations is the way of the Nature. Globalism is both anti-human and anti-natural. Long live Vladimir Putin.

  5. Don't get me wrong, I think Putin is a good leader and lately I've noticed he's been a lot calmer with how things are in the world now, when people are in power longer they have their KGB units that control anything and anyone who gets out of line. I don't mind a leader as long as they are peaceful with the world and when America started that bullshit in Ukraine he could have easily got super pissed off but he didn't and he kept calm and handled it very well considering

  6. Comment section is either full of retards or kremlin bots. Otherwise, a reasonable human would never praise a dictator.

  7. You can almost hear western leaders all facepalming at the mere thought of Putin still running Russia long after they have been cast aside, and in Trump and Merkel's case long after they have turned into worm food.

  8. He saved Russia from ruin and restores it to a great nation. God bless Vladimir and Russian from Greece.

  9. Putin should be president of the world
    But sadly : ( every soul will taste the death ) -quran

  10. Yes. Because the alternatives are detrimental and destabilizing to the nation. Governing Russia is unique to itself and other governmental forms cannot be superimposed and expected to be successful.

  11. God Bless President Putin!
    He has absolute respect for his country, institutions and people. It's difficult not to love a man of such respect as him. The western media can say otherwise, but he's a symbol of balance of power and stability in global politics. I believe, history will remember him as a phenomenal personality not just for Russia, but for the world.
    God Bless Russia, God Bless our countries!

    With love from Nigeria 🇳🇬,

  12. The best wishes for prez.Putin from Poland where propaganda against Russia in polish tv is on daily basis.

  13. Thats good because puts the level very high. If putin runs again in 2024 it means there would be motive for high political level in such elections.

  14. I support this completely. Without putin, "diversity" and posmodernist values will take over russia. We need russia to be a resistance against those values. Greetings from Bogotá Colombia.

  15. Insha ALLAH putin will fall as he got a lot of curses for killing thousands of innocent people. Even his tongue blocks

  16. Why not apply the 5 years rule to keep it clean as you did wit all other bodies of work? What if you get someone less onorable tan you that becomes a dictetor?

  17. Putin, o Desconfiado. Vinte anos no poder e não confia em ninguém para sucede-lo. Até o rosto quer que permaneça o mesmo.

  18. Westerns feel so threatened "President for life" 😂 Putin leads the nation as far as he can. This is a good news indeed!

    Слава Россия 🇷🇺

  19. i'm reading all the comments .. i knew all nationalities love pr.Putin.. people who love God , love Putin as well .. he is a true leader

  20. The day Putin moves out of Russia's leadership, Russia will get rapped by the western vultures…. Russia has always been the target and will always be the target…. Russians should appreciate Putin while he's still around….

  21. Will holders of multiple passports, multiple citizenships, be permitted to hold office? A restriction on this was proposed previously, but I didn't hear it mentioned in this address.

  22. President Putin is undoubtedly one of most rational, most diplomatic, most intelligent and well versed presidents around in the World.

    Everything he says has a deep meaning and makes sense to most oblivious.

    He is patient and wise as well. Which is a virtue of a very few.

    I hope that Mr. Putin's constitutional law will be well accepted as it makes a lot of sense.

    Economic, political and social stability as well as longevity is something extremely important and should be appreciated.

    Kind regards from Norway!

  23. There is no need to change people in power if the person us already doing everything for his people. Changing power makes the country down

  24. This president is too much I like this president because he have clear heart tell true good putting one love from Africa good advice thanks you is not like my president my homeland president is more crazy than me hahaha

  25. man… o …man, ….. this man really loves his people and his county Russia.
    The Russian people are so lucky to have him as president…..
    Not many like him in this world….. God bless him and bless his people, the Russians.

  26. Today marks the day that Putin is declared Czar over the new Russian Empire. It marked a horrid change for the people of Russia. Millions died as a result and millions more were places in camps because they dare question Putin.

  27. почему скачет валюта?! валюта держится на сырье, колония, придаток для других стран, не нужно никаких захватов территорий проводить, войн, развалить легче страну изнутри и делай с аборигенами что хошь.

  28. What Russia needs is less regulations and private market manufacturing. Self sustainability is critical for every country that cares about it's sovereignty and future prosperity. The millions of unnecessary regulations are choking the country's great potentials. Also, open the doors for foreign investments with lower taxes and relaxed regulations. Just that alone will bring Russian into 21 century, ahead of everyone else in this world…

  29. I’d support that and the same for Trump. 2 leaders who actually care about their country and its people. I don’t know what they have in Russia but in America we have the Democratic Party who hates the American people and what our country stands for. God bless Putin and Trump and protect them. ❤️

  30. I would really wish him to have more time being in the nature and the wild he likes so much, and almost looked like he could, but like the most Russian (80% loves him, 15% don't see anyone else who could make the job like him, and the 5% of Neoliberale establishment who would like to be in charge and Robb and pillage), like the most Russian, more and more European and other countries people are getting nervous, WHY? (and aside MSMedia BS)
    Because till now, every time, from Iran deal, chemical weapons destruction, intervention, rebuilding or peace initiative Russia and Putin where the side who tried somehow to make a agreement, in the front or behind the scenes, and in the out of control Military Industrial Complex and NATO, if a different type of guy would lead Russia, a man without the calmness, intelligence and knowledge, I don't know what or where we all would be!
    So, again 😂😂😂, I am really sorry and I would like to see him having time and being there where he would like to be, BUT LIKE A LOT OF PEOPLE IN RUSSIA, THE WORLD IS GETTING MORE AND MORE UNSTABLE, AND PRESIDENT PUTIN IS A ROCK IN THE SEA!
    And he is in good shape, so maybe he make one or two more terms, minimum one

  31. I hope Russia gets another Putin when he gets too old. He never gets old I'll be 80 in 50 years and Putin will still be the same.

  32. We are lucky that there is a President Vladimer Putin who really love his country. He is giving a clear message to every leader of the world that If I can do it you can do it

  33. Long live to the boss of bosses! Putin a real man writing his name with gold letters in the history! ДАВАИ РОССИЯ, ДАВАИ!!!!!

  34. До этого момента я полностью поддерживал Путина, теперь я считаю что он действительно узурпировал власть, причем нагло и открыто.

  35. Zionist putin with his “friends of Zion” award, helping sex traffic russian children to israel, and human traffic “refugees” to Europe . Such a great man, definitely not controlled. Don’t forgot trump and Putin got asked to build the 3rd temple in Jerusalem, weird considering they are both “anti establishment and not controlled”

  36. He is the man, and he is so right, look at how crazy things are getting in Western Europe, where it is not clear who has the power.

  37. President Putin is a great leader who loves his county.  In Canada, our "leader" Trudeau has sold us out to foreign interests against our will.

  38. Bloody well said again ……every president in the world needs to watch him, study him, and learn from the best…..because he's the only president that can run Russia . …. and if he left??,…. Russia would die and go back to the ages of soviet times…..people on April 22 vote him in ….change your constitution so all Russian people can prosper . …he's your only hope for a better Russia

  39. 👍🇷🇺💪👌✌️🇦🇺😎
    Very impressive!
    A true leader of the people.

    Nice to hear the relevance of being socially responsible, while the US proudly state that they will never be socialist.
    Goes to show their true nature, slavery!

  40. A FRIEND , a BROTHER , a TRUE LEADER in every sense of the word .

  41. Like previous comments, I personnally agree not only Russia needs Putin, but the world does until permanent stability attained in his country. Until then let Putin bring Russia even till the grim reaper's visit comes.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *